There are a lot of yellowed, crinkled manuscripts of by-lined articles sitting on someone's windowsill, gathering dust. That's often because they were done backwards. Authors often start by interviewing sources, writing the article, and getting it approved. Then they'll start shopping the finished article around to editors. The problem is that the finished manuscript probably doesn't match any publication's requirements. An editor may be interested in the topic but want a different approach. Or the editor may want one section of the article expanded, and other parts killed. Or the topic is all wrong, and no publication is interested in running it.
We believe this approach leads to a lot of wasted time and effort, disappointment by the sources who have put a lot of time and thought into the article, and a blow to the credibility of the PR person who did the work. Here's a better way: