GoTo HomePageHarwood Engineering Company, Inc.

Float and Stall Curves in Controlled-Clearance Deadweight Testers with a Simple Piston

by D.H. Newhall, I. Ogawa,a) and Zilberstein

The effect of piston rotation speed and fluid viscosity on the performance of free-piston gauges with a controlled clearance was studied as part of an experimental program aiming at the better evaluation of pressure by these primary pressure standards. Calculated effective area is shown to be greatly influenced by both speed of rotation and choice of a fluid. An optimum rpm resulting in the smallest possible uncertainty in effective area should be determined experimentally for each fluid and pressure range involved. When all the pertinent parameters are properly selected an appreciable improvement in accuracy can be achieved.

Introduction

Controlled-clearance deadweight testers (DWT) have been successfully used since 1950.1 The performance of this primary pressure standard was the subject of many fundamental studies2-5 dealing with pressure measurements above manometer level and up to 3 GPa. From its conception the accuracy inherent to its design has been appreciably greater than for any other free-piston gauge in the high-pressure range. With such instruments, pressure is determined as the ratio of a precisely known force over a precisely known effective area. The object of the studies was always to refine evaluation of the effective area, since this is the source of the major portion of the uncertainty in pressure measurement.

Our experience has shown that certain aspects of this evaluation could be improved. Specifically, it seemed to be important to clarify the effect of the speed of rotation of the piston. Also, in the past we and some other investigators assumed implicitly2,6 that the stall would not depend in any way on the properties of the fluids as long as they remain fluid. Later, evidence was found suggestive that this concept might be wrong. Some results showing the effect of piston rotation speed and fluids of various viscosities on stall curves are presented in this article. A conventional cylindrical piston is denoted as simple, as opposed to two other kinds of pistons, namely, grooved and spherical ones.
 

Theory

Fall-rate Curves
In any free-piston gauge there is a constant leakage, or flow, of the working fluid through the annular clearance between the piston and the cylinder.

The flow through an annular orifice can be approximately described by the following relation:

(1)
where Q is the displaced volume, which is equal to piston area, ap times velocity of the piston Vp; dp is the piston diameter, k is a constant, e is the effective radial clearance between the piston and the cylinder, and Pm is the measured pressure; m is the viscosity, and L is the length of the path between piston and cylinder over which the flow gradient takes place.

From Equation (1) an expression for Vp1/3 which is very useful in the analysis of DWT performance can easily be derived:

(2)

The variable Vp1/3 is used in plotting experimental results on piston fall rate versus jacket pressure Pj. The resulting curves (known as fall-rate or float curves) for a given measured pressure are linear, as shown in Figure 1(a).

An important parameter in the theory of controlled-clearance DWT is the slope of m of a fall-rate curve which can be represented in the form

(3)
where dPj=DPjs-DPjo [see Fig. 1(b)], C is a constant, and one assumes that e is proportional to dPj.

From Eq. (3) it is seen that the slope of a fall-rate curve depends on the viscosity of a particular fluid at the measured pressure under consideration and the pressure, provided that L is constant.

In the determination of an effective area the radial clearance e is involved. Since it is proportional to dPj, the clearance at a fixed fall rate is also proportional to the cube root of viscosity over measured pressure.

Slope of stall Curves
The slope of stall curves for a simple piston configuration, in the first approximation, can be derived under the assumption that the jacketed cylinder is subjected to both internal and external pressures throughout the length between the external packings, and there is no gradient of the internal pressure except a fairly sharp drop at the level of the top packing.

The average area of the piston can be presented in the following form7:

(4)

At stall, jacket pressure deformation of the bore due to DPjs is supposedly equal to deformation of the bore and piston due to the measured pressure, which means that at this point the bore and piston have essentially the same diameter assuming there is no "residual" film of high-pressure fluid between them. Hence, the strain at the bore due to DPjs equals the strain at the bore due to Pm plus the strain at the piston due to Pm. Thus, from elasticity one may arrive at

(5)
Solving for the slope of a stall curve, we find
(6)
In the case of a carbide piston (mp= 0.22 and Ep = 6.12 X 105 MN/m²) and steel cylinder (mc = 0.285 and Ec = 2.05 X 105 MN/m²), Eq. (7) simplifies to
(7)
where W is the ratio of the outer to inner diameters of the cylinder.

Experiment

Tests were made on conventional Harwood controlled-clearance free-piston gauges DWT-1000 (Figure 2) and DWT-300 with a maximum of 453.59 kg (1000 lb.) and 136.08 kg (300 lb.) of dead weights, and a nominal diameter of the pistons of 6.35 and 2.0267 mm respectively. The gauges were installed in the Standards room of Harwood Engineering Company. Temperature in the room was maintained at (21 ± 1)°C. We were able to vary the speed of rotation of the piston on the DWT-1000 from 0 to 160 rpm. DWT-300 had a fixed speed of rotation at 35 rpm. The fall rate was measured by means of a rotary-type displacement transducer used in a way similar to that described by Heydemann and Welch.3

A signal from the transducer was fed into a recorder. Usually, we measured the fall rate over a fall distance of 1.27 mm. Also, we used a dual-beam oscilloscope (type 502) to monitor quality of the film between piston and cylinder by measuring continuously the electrical resistance of the film. Fine settings of the piston position and jacket pressure were made by means of manually operated venier displacement regulators manufactured by Harwood. Measured and jacket pressures were read out on Heise 300-mm dial gauges. Isolating valves were provided to lock in pressure in the two circuits. Relatively large tubing and fittings were used to minimize pressure drops between the panel and measuring head so that time to pressure equilibrium would be sufficiently small. The piston was made of tungsten carbide within 0.13 mm in roundness and cylindricity. Its surface roughness was better than 0.025 mm, and surface roughness on the bore surface was initially less than 0.15 mm and was improved after a run-in period. Further description of the equipment seems to be redundant since a reader can find details elsewhere.8

In all fall-rate studies the piston and the transducer were set so that in a given series of experiments, we could observe the fall rate for the same portion of the piston. Before every run we would determine an approximate "freezing" pressure, that is the jacket pressure at which the piston is just seized by the cylinder when the measured pressure is zero. Required fall rates were achieved conveniently by varying jacket pressure at a given measured pressure. These fall rates were usually within the range of 1-15 mm/s. In some of these studies even slower fall rates were used. Fall rates were determined as slopes of experimental fall distance vs. time curves recorded on strip charts. Since a fixed fall distance was used in our experiments we could present the fall-rate as the inverted time to fall through a 1.27 mm distance and plot the fall-rate curves in the coordinates jacket pressure versus cube root of the inverted time. The fall-rate curves were found by linear regression technique available on the Texas Instruments Model SR-51-II. Construction of a stall curve based on the fall rate data is described in Ref. 8, and for convenience shown on Figure 1. Here, fall-rate curves for various values of the measured pressure Pm are extrapolated to zero velocity. Intercepts of the curves with the jacket pressures can then be plotted versus measured pressure. A stall curve equation can easily be calculated by the linear regression technique. For practical purposes operating curves corresponding to any required fall rate are used. Analysis of the instrumental corrections and respective uncertainties are given in Ref. 9.
 

Results

We ran DWT-300 up to 414 MPa with white gasoline and Univis P12 at 35 rpm. These fluids were selected for their comparatively low viscosity at the maximum pressure. Experimental results for the DWT-300 are given in Figure 3. Note that the stall curve for Univis P12 lies below both the stall and the 10-minute operating curves10 for white gasoline [Figure 3(c)]. The difference between the slopes of the fall-rate curves for these fluids is readily seen from Figs. 3(a) and 3(b). Black and white dots correspond to two different runs and demonstrate a good reproducibility for the instrument.

DWT-1000 was used extensively in this study to a maximum pressure of 138 MPa in a range of 0-160 rpm with white gasoline, oil DTE-24, and Spin-Esso.11 Some experimental results on the stall curve and operating curve slopes for both deadweight testers are summarized in Table I.
 

Table I
Model
Maximum Pressure (MPa)
Nominal Piston Diameter (mm)
Fluid
Stall Curve Slope
10-minute Operating Curve Slopea
DWT-300
413.8
2.0267
Amoco White Gasoline
0.67
0.65
DWT-300
413.8
2.0267
Univis P12
0.55
0.43
DWT-1000
137.9
6.35
Amoco White Gasoline
0.73
0.70
DWT-1000
137.9
6.35
DTE-24 oil
0.55
0.46
aFor a 10-minute fall through a 1.27 mm distance, i.e. for a velocity of fall equal to approximately 2.1 mm/sec.

The slopes of the fall-rate curves for DTE-24 oil (curve 1), Spin-Esso (curve 2), Univis P12 (curve 3), and white gasoline (curve 4) are shown graphically as a function of measured pressure in Figure 4. For a given L these curves are unique and can be used to evaluate the effect of pressure on the viscosity of fluids.12

It appears that speed of rotation has a pronounced effect, both on the slopes of the fall-rate curves and the intercepts of the curves with jacket pressure axis (Figure 5).
 

Discussion

It is very apparent from the data above that the evaluation of the effective area13 is greatly influenced by the speed of the piston rotation and by the choice of a fluid. Figure 5(b) suggests that the low-rpm range, except probably for very low speeds slightly above 0 rpm, should be avoided because additional uncertainty in dPj, and hence in effective area, may be introduced. Also, in order to keep hydrodynamic resistance low we do not recommend very high rpm's. From our studies it appears to be quite evident that the effect of the rpm on the performance of a deadweight tester is significant, and more detailed investigation of the effect is necessary. We believe that for each fluid and pressure range involved there should be an optimum rpm resulting in the smallest possible uncertainty in the effective area. As an optimum we can consider the speed of rotation at which the sensitivity of an instrument determined in cross floating with another DWT is the highest.

In some of our experiments we were monitoring the fluid film which surrounds the piston by electrical resistance measurements. Our observations show that the piston axis motion might be described as a whirl motion; in other words, the axis does not remain stationary, even when the film is very thin. It means that the actual hydrodynamic behavior and the pressure distribution are more complicated than the usual assumptions imply.

Comparison of stall curves obtained with various fluids makes it quite clear that at a constant measured pressure different stall jacket pressures are required for different fluids. This is a very important result. In fact, until recently a single stall curve was believed to exist for all the fluids.

The slope of a stall curve for white gasoline is approximately 0.7, which compares favorably with calculations [see Eq. (7)], while for more viscous fluids such as DTE-24 oil, Exxon, and Univis P12, the slope is about 0.55.

There are perhaps two possible explanations for these effects. Either the common assumption that essentially metal to metal contact exists when the piston is at stall needs to be reexamined because of the existence of a "residual" fluid film between piston and cylinder which actually increases the effective area, or else the pressure distribution along the axis changes, as our results14 obtained for a DWT with a spherical piston9,15 suggest.

The authors believe that it might only be verified experimentally by measuring either clearance between the piston and cylinder or the pressure distribution along the axis. These measurements are beyond the scope of this paper.

If a residual fluid film does exist, one should be very careful when using more viscous fluids without taking it into account since a considerable error, of the order of 0.05% (Figure 6), might be introduced if calibration results obtained for a different fluid were used. Note the difference between curves 3 and 4 for Univis P12, where hypothetical curve 4 is based on the assumption that its stall curve is the same as for white gasoline.

In any case more viscous fluids, as shown in Figure 6, have far greater influence on the effective area than do fluids like white gasoline or pentane.

Also, the fact that the slope of the stall curve for white gasoline is in agreement with the calculated slope could be accidental, since in the actual cylinder, pressure drop could occur below the level  of the upper packing. To clarify this point, a specially designed geometry of the cylinder is required, where the position of the pressure gradient band would be accurately known.

As Figure 5 shows, for more viscous fluids at any given measured pressure there is considerable variation of the float curve slope due to the speed of rotation. The variation for DTE-24 oil is approximately three times as large as for white gasoline.

Thus, in the pressure range investigated in this work, white gasoline appears to be the fluid of choice considering its smaller correction in the calculation of effective area due to the clearance between piston and cylinder and the resulting smaller uncertainty. Also, the time to establish equilibrium conditions is smaller when less viscous fluids are used.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Dr. P.L.M. Heydemann, J.C. Houck, V.E. Bean, and B.E. Welch of NBS, to Professor B. Crossland of the Queen's University at Belfast, and to Dr. G.F. Molinar of the Instituto di Metrologia (Torino, Italy) for useful discussions of the results.

Footnotes

a)Visiting engineer from Tokyo Electron Limited, Tokyo, Japan
1U.S. Patent No. 2 796 229 (1949)
2D.P. Johnson and D.H. Newhall, Trans. ASME 75, 301-310 (1953).
3P.L.M. Heydemann and B.E. Welch, Experimental Thermodynamics, edited by B. Leneindre and B. Vodar (Butterworths, London, 1975), Vol. 2, Chap. 4, Part 3, p. 147.
4K. Yasunami, Metrologia 4, 4 (1968).
5C.O. Bennett and B. Vodar, High Pressure Measurement, edited by A.A. Giardini and E.C. Lloyd (Butterworths, Washington, 1963), p. 365.
6J.L. Cross, in NBS Monograph 65 (1963)
7D.H. Newhall, L.H. Abbot, and R.A. Dunn, ibid., p. 399.
8D.H. Newhall (unpublished).
9D.H. Newhall and L.H. Abbot, High Pressure Engineering, edited by H.Ll.D. Pugh (Institute of Mechanical Engineers, London, 1977), p. 237.
10Curves in the Pj-Pm coordinates corresponding to a 10-minute fall through a 1.27 mm distance.
11Supplied by NBS.
12D.H. Newhall, V. Zilberstein, and I. Ogawa (unpublished).
13In any expression for the effective area there is a term which takes into account "expansion" of the cylinder due to the difference between stall and operating jacket pressures. To avoid inevitable uncertainties in the calculated effective area, NBS prefers to measure the factor d (Ref. 3). Our objective is to explore those quantities that influence the value of d. Apparently, by comparing measured values of d to computed values one can refine the theory of controlled-clearance DWT.
14D.H. Newhall, V. Zilberstein, and I. Ogawa (unpublished).
15U.S. Patent No. 3 630 071.

Harwood Engineering Company, Incorporated – © June, 1999
455 South Street, Walpole, Massachusetts 02081
phone: 508-668-3600
fax: 508-660-2276
http://www.ultranet.com/~harwood/
email: harwood@ma.ultranet.com